....so. One of my earliest works to be posted here was dug up, put through a parser and done as motion video.
Haven't seen the video yet. Can't exactly say I'm enthused about it.
I'm not bothered by the lack of a PM asking if I was okay with this. What bothers me is that the scene chosen was meant to convey a sense of dread, a feeling that the main character was in danger, and was instead recreated for what I can only assume was a feeling of titillation. Never mind that the villain of the piece shows up again in later works, explicitly stated to be a spree murderer. That one bit was "adapted" to motion video with zero context behind it.
David Lynch never liked explaining the meaning of anything he made. Apparently, I don't get that luxury.
The damage to the scrapped 'bot in that bit was set dressing. Meant to show off that the gynoid was, in fact, a gynoid and that she'd been dispatched by the aforementioned villain of the piece. The wider truth of the matter was that said villain was targeting the main character, had done this to multiple 'bots before and was planning on adding the protagonist of the piece to his body count. I've never pitched myself as a strictly ASFR writer...or more to the point, the "SF" in my work tends to be less "sex fetish" and more "science fiction". If people find some of what I write titillating, that's fine by me. But taking one scene out of context and adapting it alongside pieces from other, explicitly ASFR work...it just rubs me the wrong way.
To make a long story short: I have no idea why that scene from that story was picked, I'm not particularly thrilled about it, and no, I don't want a PM apology or anything. What I DO want, or at least what I'd greatly appreciate, is the removal of the video versions of it from the FTP server. I'm also using this post to issue a blanket ban on AI motion video "adaptations" of ANY of my work.
If anyone does want to collaborate, via writing or music or anything of the sort, drop me a line via the usual method. As long as it's not about turning my writing into yet more A.I.-generated slop.
The Sincerest Form of Imitation (not a story)
- DukeNukem 2417
- Posts: 1216
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 9:26 am
- Technosexuality: Built
- Identification: Human
- Gender: Male
- Location: somwhere on Planet Earth
- x 4
- x 46
- Contact:
The Sincerest Form of Imitation (not a story)
Elvis Lives. Not in this timeline, but in quite a few others.
I am a traveler of both time and space, to be where I have been.
I am a traveler of both time and space, to be where I have been.
-
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 7:58 pm
- Technosexuality: Built
- Identification: Human
- Gender: Male
- Location: New England
- x 102
- x 35
- Contact:
Re: The Sincerest Form of Imitation (not a story)
How is this kind of thing any different from manips? I never hear a peep about "asking the original creator permission to use their work", and that involves REAL PEOPLE
How is that OK but the AI stuff isn't? (not talking about FBC rules, asking a general question)
How is that OK but the AI stuff isn't? (not talking about FBC rules, asking a general question)
-
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 4:51 pm
- Location: Curled up Inside a Bottle
- x 128
- x 6
- Contact:
Re: The Sincerest Form of Imitation (not a story)
[quote="DukeNukem 2417" post_id=108601 time=1750105713 user_id=3413]
....so. One of my earliest works to be posted here was dug up, put through a parser and done as motion video.
Haven't seen the video yet. Can't exactly say I'm enthused about it.
I'm not bothered by the lack of a PM asking if I was okay with this. What bothers me is that the scene chosen was meant to convey a sense of dread, a feeling that the main character was in danger, and was instead recreated for what I can only assume was a feeling of titillation. Never mind that the villain of the piece shows up again in later works, explicitly stated to be a spree murderer. That one bit was "adapted" to motion video with zero context behind it.
David Lynch never liked explaining the meaning of anything he made. Apparently, I don't get that luxury.
The damage to the scrapped 'bot in that bit was set dressing. Meant to show off that the gynoid was, in fact, a gynoid and that she'd been dispatched by the aforementioned villain of the piece. The wider truth of the matter was that said villain was targeting the main character, had done this to multiple 'bots before and was planning on adding the protagonist of the piece to his body count. I've never pitched myself as a strictly ASFR writer...or more to the point, the "SF" in my work tends to be less "sex fetish" and more "science fiction". If people find some of what I write titillating, that's fine by me. But taking one scene out of context and adapting it alongside pieces from other, explicitly ASFR work...it just rubs me the wrong way.
To make a long story short: I have no idea why that scene from that story was picked, I'm not particularly thrilled about it, and no, I don't want a PM apology or anything. What I DO want, or at least what I'd greatly appreciate, is the removal of the video versions of it from the FTP server. I'm also using this post to issue a blanket ban on AI motion video "adaptations" of ANY of my work.
If anyone does want to collaborate, via writing or music or anything of the sort, drop me a line via the usual method. As long as it's not about turning my writing into yet more A.I.-generated slop.
[/quote]
Being that pedantic assholeness is all the rage here, shouldn't this have been posted somewhere else, other then stories?
/\/\()|\|z@
....so. One of my earliest works to be posted here was dug up, put through a parser and done as motion video.
Haven't seen the video yet. Can't exactly say I'm enthused about it.
I'm not bothered by the lack of a PM asking if I was okay with this. What bothers me is that the scene chosen was meant to convey a sense of dread, a feeling that the main character was in danger, and was instead recreated for what I can only assume was a feeling of titillation. Never mind that the villain of the piece shows up again in later works, explicitly stated to be a spree murderer. That one bit was "adapted" to motion video with zero context behind it.
David Lynch never liked explaining the meaning of anything he made. Apparently, I don't get that luxury.
The damage to the scrapped 'bot in that bit was set dressing. Meant to show off that the gynoid was, in fact, a gynoid and that she'd been dispatched by the aforementioned villain of the piece. The wider truth of the matter was that said villain was targeting the main character, had done this to multiple 'bots before and was planning on adding the protagonist of the piece to his body count. I've never pitched myself as a strictly ASFR writer...or more to the point, the "SF" in my work tends to be less "sex fetish" and more "science fiction". If people find some of what I write titillating, that's fine by me. But taking one scene out of context and adapting it alongside pieces from other, explicitly ASFR work...it just rubs me the wrong way.
To make a long story short: I have no idea why that scene from that story was picked, I'm not particularly thrilled about it, and no, I don't want a PM apology or anything. What I DO want, or at least what I'd greatly appreciate, is the removal of the video versions of it from the FTP server. I'm also using this post to issue a blanket ban on AI motion video "adaptations" of ANY of my work.
If anyone does want to collaborate, via writing or music or anything of the sort, drop me a line via the usual method. As long as it's not about turning my writing into yet more A.I.-generated slop.
[/quote]
Being that pedantic assholeness is all the rage here, shouldn't this have been posted somewhere else, other then stories?
/\/\()|\|z@
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 15 guests