Bitchbots

KingJeremy · Post by **KingJeremy** » Thu Aug 12, 2010 3:22 pm

Came across a website today called www.bitchbots.com. I haven't joined (yet) or watched any of their videos (they have some for sale at clips4sale but I will probably do so here shortly.

Anyone else run across this site yet and sampled their wares? (They do have samples on the website but I didn't feel like I got a good idea of what they were selling.)

Sorry if someone has already posted this.

keraptis · Post by **keraptis** » Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:58 pm

I took a look (previews only) and got turned off for two reasons.

One is that I find girls covered in tattoos and/or piercings completely unattractive, and in particular a tatted-up body is a significant distraction from the robot fetish. To me at least, a robot girl should look shiny and new, not like she's bearing all sorts of marks and scars from things that happened before she met you, things you'd probably rather not know about.

Two, more importantly, I get the sense that the site's POV is centered on humiliation. The tone of the site isn't playful, it's mostly cruel. (Even full-on bondage-themed content is capable, ironically, of coming across as playful -- it's all in the presentation.) I get nothing at all out of scenarios in which a woman is forced to clean floors on her hands and knees. Hell, I get nothing out of calling a woman a bitch in the first place. My sense is that the guys behind the site have a certain contempt for women that makes me uncomfortable.

Just my two cents of course and I respect anyone who likes this sort of thing.

jolshefsky · Post by **jolshefsky** » Thu Aug 12, 2010 8:28 pm

I'll have to keep an eye on this site. I think the girls are highly attractive. I get keraptis point about tattoos, but I've come to realize tattoos are extraordinarily common and I pretty much got over it.

Loverbot · Post by **Loverbot** » Thu Aug 12, 2010 9:00 pm

I completly understand Keraptis Though i do not have tatoos or piercings , i do not even wear earrings anymore i sure wish i could look shiny and new myself perhaps more than any one knows. I had a look at the previews and thay are indeed ordinary women... Looks more like a transformation site than built..Also it is more about at least i will say it apears to be more about submission than ASFR.. just my opinion.

I think you have to rember that what you may view as humiliating can be very sexually arousing for others, where as i will not comment on the guys from the site. I can how ever comment on otheres and that in a healthy D/s relationship there is no contempt.. only power exchange i myslef have been called worse things than bitch and enjoyed it. Also though i have never been -made- to wash floors i have done it on many occasions for my lovers with very..stimulating results

I think the old adage applys here " do not judge a book by it's cover"

Stephaniebot · Post by **Stephaniebot** » Thu Aug 12, 2010 9:39 pm

I do have one tatt, but it is a barcode!

Do wear earrings as well, but they are studs, and thats it

Loverbot · Post by **Loverbot** » Thu Aug 12, 2010 9:48 pm

Oh Girl! OK a bar code is totally cool!

Remy · Post by **Remy** » Fri Aug 13, 2010 12:07 am

Ooooh, I'd love my girl with a barcode tattoo.

keraptis · Post by **keraptis** » Fri Aug 13, 2010 10:36 am

Loverbot wrote:I think you have to rember that what you may view as humiliating can be very sexually arousing for others, where as i will not comment on the guys from the site. I can how ever comment on otheres and that in a healthy D/s relationship there is no contempt.. only power exchange i myslef have been called worse things than bitch and enjoyed it. Also though i have never been -made- to wash floors i have done it on many occasions for my lovers with very..stimulating results

I think the old adage applys here " do not judge a book by it's cover"

Loverbot, thanks for your thoughtful comments. I understand completely where you are coming from and I agree fully that in a real-life relationship, almost anything that's got the mutual consent of everyone involved can be pleasurable, gratifying and even fulfilling despite how the scenario might appear to an outside observer. I also greatly appreciate your openness about your own experiences.

If you'll allow me to be a little more open about myself, I guess what it comes down to is that I simply don't relate to the role being played by the male "character" on the site. (I say "character" because we're watching scripted content, not a sneak peek into a real relationship.) Scenarios like what I saw there go beyond a "dominant" male to a "domineering" male and I just don't derive any pleasure from imagining myself in that role. I can certainly enjoy a scenario in which I have a female robot that does my bidding, but I guess I'm just a very easy guy to work for.

As I tried to say even in my first post above, I completely respect both the men and the women who enjoy these sorts of fantasies. That comes with the caveat that the people involved only have my respect and support to the extent that they live up to the code of ethics and mutual respect you describe. A relationship with abusive overtones in reality (as opposed to just fantasy) is something I can't condone.

Anyway, I'll probably keep an eye on the site as well, in case they create any content that's more up my alley.

PsychoKirby · Post by **PsychoKirby** » Thu Aug 19, 2010 4:39 am

Judging by the preview clip, I have to agree with keraptis. This website is about dominating women, not robots.