
When my script grows up, I want to be just like you guys.
Videos are resembling the robo-smuttiest stories posted in the FembotWiki archive, in FC, or on MCStories. There is a high mark being set, for plot writing and fembot-ness; and around the corner, Sir Anthony F'n Hopkins as the star scientist behind HBO's new Westworld series.
Will they come to the same conclusions we did, as they roll out their plots? Will they start with the basic, familiar ASFR story devices? I hope they do the good, simple stuff we've known since the late 1990s; and build towards the depth of exploration we are attempting. But will JJ Lensflare and his writer's room zoom past us, writing scenes that make us say, "Damn, I've never read or thought about or seen that trope."?
I've got a nice expository device written into an outline, about a sleeper-Stepford housewife greeting her spouse at the door, then trying to convince her dominant mistress/wife that they should buy their first fembot. Together, lying on the couch, they leaf through the sales brochure, talking about how the units perform, what they can do, everything. You get to see pictures, pages like maybe Kube^2's phenomenal work. The actresses would have a printed prop, serving to anchor them to the content [which must be real because it exists in the brochure], and makes for what I think is
a powerful opportunity to gracefully dump a metric ton of exposition into a story.
A major point of the exposition is how the fembot's calculations don't resemble a mind, that she is an unthinking thing, and that her perceptions and memories are entirely programmable. She is unreal, an utterly changeable non-person.
The video could show scenes from the catalog, as they imagine them. Other locations, fragments of scenes, cut-away opportunities - nearly unlimited chances to show bits where you could normally never establish all the rules the audience needs to know, without the exposition ever becoming grating, boring, complex.
The couple gets to the brochure's back pages, and they see the conversion kit option. They discuss the morality, and housewife confesses she would do almost anything for her spouse's pleasure, including applying the kit to a convert friend. She brings a framed photo of one she would offer, and mistress reveals the truth and forces her to recognize how incongruously inhuman is her willingness to convert a friend, a human woman into a robot. Cue her nymphish identity/behavior malfunction crisis!
Housewifey couldn''t see that the framed wedding photo is herself, that she is partially disassembled on the cover of the brochure they've been reading. But don't worry, she's malfunctioning but she's not deeply disturbed by the revelation: we already know how things work from exposition earlier, how the catalog says, befuddled fembot = fun; sobbing fembot no good, so they aren't programmed that way.
The story deserves to be in a better writer's hands than mine.
Wish me luck.
- Dale Coba