Oh come on... That's the one thing in my house I want running on windows. Unlimited malfunctions and the joy of her stopping in the middle of a tender moment and asking "Are you sure you would like to engage in kissing? Press my belly button for OK or my lips to cancel"ISAF wrote:i dont like FEMBOTS running with WINDOWS OS...
LINUX is faster and more stable...
Code
Mirage wrote: ... For me, it's hard to read ir do a story with a robot woman with the brain of a dead calculator or Al Gore (bad joke, I know....sorry)
Bush is a robot, just watch him malfunction everytime hes given a question outside parameters (or is surpised)... I- uhh- well- i- i- lets talk about politics....xodar wrote:Mirage wrote: ... For me, it's hard to read ir do a story with a robot woman with the brain of a dead calculator or Al Gore (bad joke, I know....sorry)
Actually, I've always suspected Al Gore is a robot, and a rather primitive one at that.
You want to keep other people from having them?Sex Robots: I accept that there would be a market for these things and therefore I am fine with them in moderate doses. However, a robot that does nothing but bonk is boring.
Nah, that's why I said that I accept that there would be a market for sex bots and that I am fine with them in moderate doses.xodar wrote:Ciepher:You want to keep other people from having them?Sex Robots: I accept that there would be a market for these things and therefore I am fine with them in moderate doses. However, a robot that does nothing but bonk is boring.
Besides, you don't have to have one and if men are satisfied they won't be pestering you for it.
How do you decide what's an immoderate dose?Ciepher wrote:Nah, that's why I said that I accept that there would be a market for sex bots and that I am fine with them in moderate doses.xodar wrote:Ciepher:You want to keep other people from having them?Sex Robots: I accept that there would be a market for these things and therefore I am fine with them in moderate doses. However, a robot that does nothing but bonk is boring.
Besides, you don't have to have one and if men are satisfied they won't be pestering you for it.
I doubt a robot would be affected by being socially distanced, so you can't go wrong there.Ciepher wrote:I don't exactly have measurements of how many words or scenes about sex bots in a story, roleplay or film is too much for me. But if a storyline is entirely centered around a bloke making love, wanting to make love or preparing to make love to his fuck doll, I tend to stop reading, stop watching or ask out-of-character if this is all there's going to be to the roleplay.
If we're talking about a hypothetical real life situation, I wouldn't pester friends and family about theirs, but I wouldn't own one myself and would try to avoid being turned into one. I suppose I'd treat them in much the same way I treat slutty people - not outwardly rude or unpleasant, but keeping my distance (socially, of course.. if I were to literally cross the room or street, that would be terribly rude).
Ciepher wrote:Sex Robots: I accept that there would be a market for these things and therefore I am fine with them in moderate doses. However, a robot that does nothing but bonk is boring.
Mindless Robots: Again, I'm fine with them in small doses, but find them boring. I need drama, darhling.
..........................
Underage Robots In A Sexual Context: Yes, I know it's just a fantasy, but it suggests that the author may be a real-life paedophile.
.............................
Makes sense to me.Hmmmm. I guess I don't understand your viewpoint.
(1) A robot is a robot. If it's just used for sex, so what? I have in mind that it could also do housework in between times.
If someone you knew had one and used it regularly for sex several times a day but you didn't know that would your opinion of them change if you found out -- maybe after several years of pleasant friendship?
(3) If you suspect an author who writes about or produces a play or movie about pedophilia of actually being a perv do you suspect one who does a murder mystery of being a murderer or one who comes out with a historical story of being a reincarnation? If someone said they saw a mangled dog on the road do you automatically decide they ran it down themselves?
droidlvr wrote:Hmmmm. I guess I don't understand your viewpoint.
(1) A robot is a robot. If it's just used for sex, so what? I have in mind that it could also do housework in between times.
If someone you knew had one and used it regularly for sex several times a day but you didn't know that would your opinion of them change if you found out -- maybe after several years of pleasant friendship?
(3) If you suspect an author who writes about or produces a play or movie about pedophilia of actually being a perv do you suspect one who does a murder mystery of being a murderer or one who comes out with a historical story of being a reincarnation? If someone said they saw a mangled dog on the road do you automatically decide they ran it down themselves?
Makes sense to me.
Not exactly sure of the nature of your comment. To be honest I take it as being rather smart alec-y .You should be aware that the way I answered may imply that not only I agree with but that I also see the questions asked as rhetorical.Well, that looks clever. If you're in the seventh grade.
Sort of like someone asking whether you want an apple or an orange and getting the reply "Yes."
That seems equally vague.droidlvr wrote:Not exactly sure of the nature of your comment. To be honest I take it as being rather smart alec-y .You should be aware that the way I answered may imply that not only I agree with but that I also see the questions asked as rhetorical.Well, that looks clever. If you're in the seventh grade.
Sort of like someone asking whether you want an apple or an orange and getting the reply "Yes."
If I'm wrong about the above please let me know.
Yeah,maybe so. After reviewing what you've posted here,it's quite obvious that your comments escapes even you. Furthermore,the lack of responces to your recent post may be indicative of how much many even care.That seems equally vague.
My statement referred to the quote of two different statements, both with the same unclear response.
My original question was why a specific person thought that art that involved pedophilia or perhaps any kind of sex means the author engages in what's described and if so does it mean people who produce similar material about, say, murder are certainly murderers.droidlvr wrote:Yeah,maybe so. After reviewing what you've posted here,it's quite obvious that your comments escapes even you. Furthermore,the lack of responces to your recent post may be indicative of how much many even care.That seems equally vague.
My statement referred to the quote of two different statements, both with the same unclear response.
